Thursday, February 3, 2022

Abortion: Finding Real Solutions

   


Abortion.  It is a word that triggers many to take sides and get into heated arguments.  It is not a topic that seems to fall to the wayside without a battle first being fought.  The word itself demands a reaction and a response.  One must choose a side.  Those who support the action profess that abortion protects women’s reproductive rights and allows women to choose how to plan their lives at the timing that they determine best.  Legalizing the procedure protects women’s safety.  Other advocacies for abortion include lack of finances to support a family and in the case of rape.  However, as much as  the intention is meant to serve the woman in a greater span on family planning, abortion fails to serve as a probable solution for the needs for which it is claimed to serve.
When it comes to serving a community’s needs, there is often a problem for discussion and a solution for which to meet that problem.  The goal is that the problem can be decreased and eventually ceased.  However, as abortion has legalized, the problems for which it serves still persist.  Furthermore, abortions have served to be an immediate response, but do not allocate for the long-term effects for which it means to minimize.  It has already been discussed in many ways the negative effects of abortion concerning physically, emotionally and mentally.  Detailed accounts can be found in the book Prolife Feminism (Derr, M. K., MacNair, R., & Naranjo-Huebl, L. (2005). Prolife feminism: Yesterday and Today. Feminism and Nonviolence Studies Association.).      I want to assure you that I do not mean to condemn anyone.  I understand that women who make this decision, do so, not necessarily because they want it, but they believe they need to in their specific situations.  Nevertheless, I must be honest in my belief that abortion is a sin, but it also does not help the people that clinics argue they mean to help.  In the process, I hope to suggest alternative solutions and advocate how they are indeed better options. 


     Arguments for abortions, rebuttals, and alternative solutions

  1. Rape/incest: I have compassion on the woman who finds herself having been violated in the most vulnerable way.  No way, in shape or form, should she have been forced to perform against her will.  To know that this form of intrusion can and does happen in families describes the deepest sense of betrayal.  If a child, she is not ready to become a mother.  A woman may fear that the child may remind her of the trauma.  However, even if an abortion occurs, that girl or woman will be left with the memory.  Despite a fetus no longer present, dreams may turn into nightmares.  And an abortion can never remove those. As an alternate choice, use the funding that would be forwarded to abortion clinics to provide for free mental health and trauma counseling.  This will help with the actual trauma, rather than adding to it.

  2. Out of financial risk: Some women have families.  Others may be starting out.  However, an unplanned pregnancy coming at a time when the finances are limited only exacerbate what anxieties may already be present.  I cannot deny that it would seem as an easy fix to just remove an extra stressor.   Humans predominantly deal with stress by removing the indicator.  And I know that a decision toward abortion would not be taken lightly; especially for a woman who is already a mother.  However, an alternative solution is modifying the welfare system.  Instead of income informing an all or none recipient decision, I would suggest that we do some form of a graduated system.  If a household increases their income $100, decrease the assistance by a certain percentage.  I am not an economist, but I believe this decision would reward and support individuals who are trying to improve their lives.

  3. “It’s just not time”:  If you take the time to read Prolife Feminism, you will find an interesting note about what the early feminists argued as a means against abortion.  Many said that women should be in charge of their own family planning, instead of succumbing to the demands of men’s sex drives and thus providing to be pregnant over and over, beyond what their physical capabilities can sustain.  As I read this book, I found it ironic that the argument against abortion was subsequently the means for which to argue for it.  Of the three arguments, the third makes the majority of the abortions in America.  Whether it is a teen or a woman who wants to continue in her career choices, “It’s just not the right time” is the advocacy.  I understand that plans are made and life happens.  Often, I think that many people try their darndest to keep with those plans, no matter what.  However, this is the option that receives the most criticism from the pro-life community.  This being: if you choose to have sex, you carry the risk of getting pregnant.  Children sometimes result.  If it is not time or if someone feels ill-prepared, there are organizations that can help teach how to mother.  If that is not an option, adoption is also available.  I wish adoption was more affordable, but there are many couples who physically can’t have children, and are willing to care for a child.  (P.S.  I FULLY advocate that men should also take responsibility for when they are fathering a child.  No way should women be the taking the brunt when it takes two for a child to be produced.)


     When I took a feminism course in college, I asked about adoption as an alternative for abortion. The class became so quiet, you could hear a pin drop.  Then someone spoke, “You would subject a woman to care for a child for nine months and then expect her to give up that kid?!  Do you know what kind of emotional trauma that would result?”  I could have replied, “Well, I bet it would beat the emotional trauma of killing their child.”  I didn’t say anything.  I don’t think I would have won the argument, and I think all I would have done is just shut down doors and make things really heated.  Right or wrong, I chose to offer the choice and let others take their stance and thoughts. 
    Why couldn’t therapy be free for rape victims?  Why couldn’t the welfare system be modified to support families who are trying to work?  Why does adoption have to be such a dirty word?  Modern day adoption includes closed and open; so a mother can choose to be a part of their child’s life later on.  Other solutions can be made available - ones that address the actual need, and not add other trauma to the person.  But the fight is not over these other options.  The legal fight is over abortion, specifically.  As if, if abortion were to be made illegal, no other options could help women.  Nevertheless, this is not the case in reality.
    Abortion is a highly debated topic, because there is the question of the personage of the fetus.  One side advocates that the womb is holding a living being; another side charges that it is just cells, and therefore is just unwanted added tissue.  However, science has found that it is distinctly two separate beings present in a pregnant woman.  Moreover, they have found heartbeats and physical features forming at the earliest stages of development. 
    As for my personal stance, it is a child.  There is a being, which means there is a right to life, and therefore a right to live.  I hope you read that last sentence slowly.  I not only advocate for a baby to be born.  I also support the family who is also having the child.  From the girl being raped, to the woman who can’t pay bills or even a woman who found herself pregnant after a one-night stand…I am willing to participate in helping where needed.  And many Christians and other pro-lifers would say the same, if one were to ask them. 
    I know that many have heard the condemnation.  They hear “murderer” and feel they can’t come forward.  Even if they regret a previous abortion.  But may I let you in on a little secret?  Jesus warned that if any of us have hatred in our hearts, then we have committed murder.  So…can I judge a woman who has had an abortion?  No.  For in my heart, I have murdered.  But just like Jesus has worked in me to forgive, I believe that the approach to abortion can change.  Abortion needs not be the prominant solution to trauma or unplanned pregnancies.  I believe that as a nation and as communities, we can gather around women who are in unforeseen circumstances and help them.  Women can dream again, they can raise their families, finish school and have careers. 
    But as the old saying goes, it takes a village to raise a child.  So, let us no longer leave girls and women in positions where they have to take care of the problem they encounter, alone. After all, they are part of our community.  And coming from the pro-life community, I want to apologize for any times we have condemned women who have found themselves in accepting abortion, and disregarding the humanity of these women.  I can only imagine being in a place where death is seen as a hope.  And I wish that we could have surrounded you more warmly.

     I do not have a statement of how I survived an abortion.  I was a scandal baby (i.e. born out of wedlock), but my mother decided to have me.  No hesitation.  In fact, my parents were still shacking up when my mom found out about me.  We haven’t always gotten along.  High school sucked, since we fought daily.  But the moment I knew my mom loved me was when she told me (at age 22) that she still would have had me, even if my dad left.  I was a scandal, but I was a blessing.  I’m thankful for my life and can see God’s hand more and more at work when I reflect. 
    I do not mean to bring condemnation, but I hope I may stir conviction.  Children are worth having, no matter the circumstance.  I wish our nation (and as I write this, I am reminded that globally, women probably struggle with lack of rights and support more than American women) could have better social, emotional and economical supports for women.  But as with any problem, it is crucial to start looking for solutions.  Solutions that actually work.

   

Man Trouble

     


 There was a time I believed that God showed me my future husband.  I held onto this man (because I just so happened to have met him) expecting that he would want to go after Jesus like I did, and hoping that he would repent of the compromises he made in his life.  Thing is, he knew he would never deny the existence of God, but he didn’t want to have Jesus be Lord over his life.  As of last year, I finally let him go.  Not just ignore him and wait for God’s timing on when “my” man and I could finally be united.  I told God, “Maybe You really did show me my future husband.  And if it plays out as such, I will be grateful and delightfully surprised.  However, communicating with this man on the basis of what I hoped him to be is only a form of lust.  It is better and healthier to pray for ____, and if I date other men, genuinely interested and not from a perspective of what he can do for me…Even if I break up, if I learn how to have a healthy outlook on dating, that would be better.”  I let him go as my fulfillment as a wife.  He still comes to my mind, but I have learned to pray for him as a friend who genuinely cares about him and not for him to feel a void in my life.     I am a woman and still single.  And even though it seems like opportunities are increasing, I can’t help but notice that I also have carried since junior high (seriously!) certain expectations concerning relationships and how to go about them.   I have discussed how easy it is to blur lines when it comes to sexual purity, but what I am finding is the internal pressures on how to date.  You know…the first step in how to build a repore' with someone you’re interested in.      In the last couple of months, I have had two men from a small group present an interest in wanting to get to know me.  One offered a possibility of a dinner, but there hasn’t been any subsequent discussion.  Recently, a second man asked for coffee.  The previous Tuesday he mentioned that he liked talking with me.  Thing is, I don’t have an interest in either of these men.  I was polite in turning down the opportunities, and yet, I felt like I had to internally convince myself that it was okay to say no.  In the name of giving him a chance, I have been told to say yes.  “Even if it ends up just being a friend.”      Doesn’t it mislead a man if I say “yes” when I actually have no interest?  Must I justify my reasons?  Whether it be age or not being physically attracted or lack of knowing the person, do I have to go on that coffee date?  I wonder why this concerns me so, is because there is a part of me that is just rebellious in nature (i.e. tell me to do something, and I will do the opposite).  Or, I wonder if it bothers me, because in my codependent habits, if I differed with someone, it is somehow my fault.  And lastly, perhaps the most drastic of fear, I wonder if pushing women to take a man’s offer, despite personal (lack of) interest almost pervades into the rape culture we see in the United States.  (Telling women that they should say yes to a date can communicate that they should agree to other romantic gestures.  That is dangerous.  And perhaps I am just taking this to an extreme.  But as a woman, it feels so painful to say yes when everything else says no.)     I am not a man.  However, if I was one…if I asked a girl out and she wasn’t interested, I would rather her be more upfront.  Let me be in the friendzone, instead of stirring up my hopes or imaginations.  As a woman, I don’t want to feel obligated in the name of “God knows what we need” (yes, this was brought up to me while one of the men was interested in me).     Back when I was in junior high, I was basically told that I should wait for the “one” and then date.  I no longer agree that this is healthy.  Even asking for God to show me my future husband came from a place of fearing that He hadn’t prepared someone for me; it was out of fear that no man would actually choose me.  I wanted God to do the work of the courtship instead of having to mitigate it myself.  It was solely selfish.  From my experience with a man asking to have sex with me and would pay $100 to video it, I am actually more guarded about getting to know men in a deeper context, anyway.     I wasn’t traumatized that I cannot build relationships with men.  But I won’t initiate a friendship, unless it is done so within a group of mutual friends.  And frankly, as I process on how to walk out sexual purity while having an interest in dating, is building a friendship first a bad place to start?  I can get to know his character, personality, his relationship with God, etc… Even someone that I may not have been initially interested in may in time become an interest, because I grew in friendship with boundaries intact.      People may argue that a date can be used for that.  I can get to know someone and eventually be interested, even if I wasn’t at the beginning.  But I know how my mind and heart are wired.  I can become extremely open about my thoughts, and have said too much too early.  My love languages are words of affirmation and quality time, and so I know that things will stir in my heart quite easily.  However, and most definingly - if I am interested, I will look forward to the date, but if I am not interested, then I will be dreading it to come to pass.     This is the point I am at now.  I am growing in my personal convictions, and though I do not want to ignore godly wisdom (from which I can learn from Christian couples I trust), I am realizing that I am an individual who has had experiences and found that I need to walk this dating thing with Jesus like any other thing.  When I was nervous about the second guy asking for a date, I felt like God had told me, “You don’t have to be attracted to him.”  That was literally the pressure that I was feeling from this!  And yet, God allowed me to say no.       The thing is, God knows my life and what it will entail.  He knows who my husband is.  And if something doesn’t work out, then I can trust God that it was either not the man or not the time.  As I saw from a Sons and Daughters clip, “God is not going to give you someone else’s spouse.”  This pressure - even found in the church - to accept an invitation despite personal interest or conviction (because, as my dad has told me, not every man is made for every woman and vice versa) is damaging.  It brings a level of uncomfortableness and pressure that is not needed.  Moreover, the church needs to stop the idea that every person needs to be in a relationship.     At this time, I think a good boundary for a romantic interest is 1) Meet 2) Get to know in a social setting and 3) Go on a one-on-one date.  Friendzone men stay at step 2.  However, I am wondering about two other men I have met from Sunday church.  I could see wanting to get to know them.  What is amazing is though I like talking to each of them, I have not found myself crushing on them, nor being infatuated with them.  If either asked me for coffee, I wonder if I can allow myself to say yes.  I see courtship as an opportunity to care for a man’s heart and invite God into the relationship, whether it remains a friendship or becomes more.  I am adamant for physical boundaries and continuing group hang-outs to provide accountabilities.  But I am letting go of the pressure to find the “one”.  There are desires, but I have given God full access to the romantics, and I am trusting that God is guiding me in my spirit, thoughts and emotions, as well as my future.