There’s an allure concerning royalty. The public loves to mock the idea of a continuing monarchy, but simultaneously, holds a level of awe and respect for one who holds that position. Moreover, there is the occasional fantasy of what it would be like to be one of the royals (or part of their family). What is it about royalty - and more specifically, the British family - that captures our attention so? Perhaps it is the wealth, prestige, influence? Maybe it’s the scandal. Diana Spencer - more properly known as Princess Diana - has been dead for a little more than 25 years, but we still cannot get over idolizing her in the public eye. Furthermore, as Charles has become king, the world (or at least Americans) cannot get enough of reminding him how horrendous he was - and must still be - due to his infidelity. The Crown is a dramatized biopic on the reign of Queen Elizabeth II. In season 5, she must address the breakdown of her family’s marriage on a personal and political level.
In watching this season, I couldn’t help but reflect on expectations of duty, honor and family reflected in the first few episodes. Disclaimer: I have heard that the show aimed to be more historically accurate, however, in the fifth season, they used a lot of creative liberties. This might be due to the fact that much of what is seen was probably witnessed by one person, or these people have since died before anything could be confirmed. I am not claiming that the following examples are true in its account. In fact, they may all be fictionalized. However, in The Crown’s portrayal, I found I may understand a little of the complexities of being a part of the royal family.

Poster advertising for The Crown, Season 5
1) Even the Queen wasn’t immune from mistakes. There were moments that Queen Elizabeth had asked for something to be done. Nay. She didn’t just ask. She sometimes demanded, based on her position of sovereignty. Queen Elizabeth II is sometimes seen as an untouchable person (the fact that she died (though being 98 years old) still surprised most of the world). Maybe she was the next closest thing to God, Himself. We forget that she was human. And though she aimed to influence with honesty and humility, it doesn’t mean she got it right all the time. I actually find comfort in this fact. So often, I have felt an immense internal pressure to be perfect. Of course, friends and family are quick to say, “No one’s perfect.” But what if I was in Queen Elizabeth’s position? The higher the pedestal, the greater the influence, the heavier the weight to never fail. No one can live under that expectation and seeing this failing in Queen Elizabeth’s portrayal only reminds me that instead of judging politicians and leaders, maybe I should pray. If I want mercy when I make a mistake, perhaps they do, as well. It’s high time we stop worshiping people in high level positions.
2) Consideration for grace and truth when the family is falling apart. When Elizabeth’s childrens’ were divorcing, she was appalled at the notion, and demanded that they reconsider. As a Christian, I can empathize with her outcry. Divorce is disgusting, because it damages the family unit. God meant for marriage to last. Nevertheless, Queen Elizabeth demanded something that was not in her realm of control (no matter the expectations of royalty). I know how easy it is to want to control something in someone else’s life, because what is being desired is unhealthy or ungodly. And yet, I am not God. I cannot change someone’s heart or behavior, and therefore, the best thing I can do is pray for the person. I can walk with the person. Speak truth but it’s so important to surround them with grace and love. In The Crown, Charles and Anna seemed like they were being made to feel that not only are they failing their individual families, but their mother and the entire country by divorcing. Would empathy have changed their situations? Maybe, maybe not. But in navigating such a painful situation, I believe grace would have fostered reconciliation, rather than resentment.
3) The sanctity of marriage should have been fought for more than the public image. I find it odd that the royal establishment would oppose divorce in the name of public image but would turn a blind eye to any form of infidelity. This notion wasn’t just shared in The Crown. In The King’s Speech, the future King George VI is speaking to his brother that he shouldn’t marry his mistress in order to keep up the image, but he could “keep her on the side” (marrying a divorced individual was NO BUENO!) To reiterate my second point, marriage IS meant to be sacred. However, requiring individuals to stay in an unhealthy marriage for the sake of saving face is only going to perpetuate the problem. Anna divorced because she was cheated on. Charles had cheated on Diana. Even on a biblical basis, these divorces were allowed. Would it have been great for the couples to go to counseling and heal? Absolutely! But it is important to take the necessary steps to actually heal rather than cover it up in the name of “God doesn’t like divorce” and hope for the best.
4) One cannot love and care for others beyond what love has been received. According to The Crown, Diana didn’t seem to understand the position of royalty vs. family dynamics. The public knows how empathetic and kind Diana was, however, there was simultaneously a yearning to be loved by her in-laws. In the show, she then sulks and turns inward. Searching to be loved, and pleading with family members, she became the victim. On one hand, I understand that it wasn’t really about Diana. The focus of the royal family was to support the Queen. However, I disagreed with the Duke of Edinburgh when he told her that when Diana wanted a family centered approach, she misunderstood the expectation. At some level, politics are politics, but family is family. And if someone doesn’t know they are loved, then the compassion they have for others will stall. I’ve learned this the hard way. I poured out so much wanting affirmation and love from the people I was giving my attention to, but in the end, because I wasn’t finding my source of love from Someone who can always give it, I turned inward and fell into depression. Diana did the same, and also became involved in adultery before her divorce. Personally, I am learning that I MUST find my satisfaction from Jesus, first. People will have expectations, or in their own short-sightedness or selfishness, leave me. Will I be defined by their love? If so, then I will become a victim and become selfish in how I serve people. But, if I know that God’s love for me will never end, even if my heart is broken, I can still love others in the way that He does.
5) Even the bad ones can still do good things. One of the most shocking things I found in The Crown, frankly, was finding out all the charity work that Charles emphasized back in the 90s. We hear so much of his infidelity to Diana and how horrible a person he was, that many people across the pond probably don’t know about the things he did for disenfranchised youth (i.e., The Prince’s Trust, which was begun in 1976).
That last point is something I want to weigh in, considering the real King Charles III. As he will assume the throne, much of his reign will fall in speculation, because of his failure with Diana. I have never seen anyone applaud Camilla as an option for Queen Consort. As this transition occurs, the world seems to only find criticism. In doing this, we are sinning against Charles and Camilla.
We are holding onto an offense that is not ours to judge. Yes, Diana was an amazing woman. Yes, she served the people graciously. Yes, Charles should have cut it off with Camilla. But can we please stop acting like their sin was against us? Their sin was against their families, against each other, and most of all, to God. I wish we could say we could change the past, but we can’t. And so, we must look forward. How may we extend mercy to the royals? After all, if any of us ever committed adultery and repented, wouldn’t we want a chance for a blank slate?
I don’t know if Charles and Camilla know Jesus. I don’t know if they have repented. I hope they have. It doesn’t make sense to call for their divorce now that they are married, but I pray they apologize to God, and to their family members. Frankly, I desire reconciliation in their family more than a public apology. After all, they didn’t sin against me. I am not one of their subjects. And even if I was, the divorce primarily affects their family, not me (if Diana hadn’t died, I bet she would have still done charity work within her realm of influence). If there is anything that can summarize lessons from The Crown, it is this: No person is perfect. We all have sinned and need Jesus to redeem us of our wrongdoings and to empower us to reconcile with our families. As Christians, may we extend this truth to those who need it. Including King Charles and Queen Consort Camilla.


